Posted by
Charles Lewis on Saturday, June 23, 2007 7:31:48 PM
by Charles Lewis
Just how passionate is President Bush about destroying his party (Rush Limbaugh - accurately - calls the current amnesty bill the "Destroy the Republican Party Bill," what with its 30,000,000 imported Democratic voters, just for starters) and his country (WorldNetDaily - quite aptly - calls it "national suicide")? [I call it the BBB, or 3B - Border Betrayal Bil, by the way.] Why, he's passionate enough to describe the macabre legislation - in his weekly radio address, no less - as the exact opposite of what it is. (In less polite society, that's called "prevarication.")
Among the W whoppers intended to buffalo the American sheeple in the immediate run-up to the in-their-face passage of this piece of high treason, he claims:
- it'll bar gang members (an amendment that was defeated!),
- that as things stand now we have to let dangerous criminals among the invaders loose in our streets after 6 months detention,
- even that the legislation bars illegal border crossers permanently! (precisely the opposite of what it does)
It's obvious that Bush will not be satisfied as long as one jot or tittle (take your pick) of America, her culture, her political legacy, or her sovereignty remains. And that this end is so noble it justifies any and all means.
And, of course, Bush is on board with Mississippi Senator Trent "La Chavez," who wants to team with colleagues Boxer and Clinton in closing talk radio's (and its listeners') nosey mouths. Remember, according to Bush, we oppose what's right for America. In fact, in the words of Sen. Lindsay "Grahamnesty" and many other "conservatives," we're bigots. A few examples of our "bigotry" come to mind:
- our racist concern that an agency that can't handle a hundred thousand applications over six months might not be able to process twenty (probably more like thirty) million background checks in twenty-four hours, and that a few thousand terrorists might take advantage of that to "slip through the cracks,"
- our jingoistic worry that the stipulation that only two friends of any description will need to vouch for these terrorists' presence in América prior to 1/1/07 to assure amnesty,
- our intolerant skittishness at the fact that an amendment that would have undercut sanctuary cities for future invader (the invaders already here won't need them, as América will be their sanctuary city) was defeated,
- our hysteria over the fact that another amendment that would have banned from amnesty members of illegal alien gangs like MS-13 (which law enforcement all over the country calls the worst in América's history, what with the fact that we generally can't get convictions since they murder so many witnesses) was similarly batted down,
- our xenophobic objection to the quashing of another amendment that would have barred from the "3B freebees" 600,000 deportees whom we subsequently somehow forgot to bounce out the national door and who didn't see fit to leave of their own volition,
- our spasms over the fact an amendment that would have made "inglés" the official national tongue - along with just about all other sensible amendments - was routed,
- our culturalist snit fit over the speeding of the demise of Social Security by an estimated 10-20 years, and
- our chauvinistic uneasiness over the fact that it makes no sense that any border defender would use force of any kind to do his job, what with scads of those that did (Ramos, Compeán, Corbett, Hernandez, the LA MacArthur Park riot police...) and even one that didn't (Alemán) are rotting in prison under the most squalid and inhuman of conditions (or are about to go there) for their troubles.
All over the country - according to reports from all over the political spectrum - we bigots are riled over this giveaway of America; Tom Tancredo is and has been the face of this "ugly American" outrage for years, right? So why is he not registering in the polls, especially when most "mom and pop" (and thus clearly non-rigged) polls show him either winning or at least a strong contender? Do you mistrust the mainstream polling (opinion forming?) industry as much as this paranoid bigot does at this point?
Charlotte talk host Jeff Katz has an apt analogy for the BBB: It's as if somebody robbed a bank of $100,000, and our solution was to tell him that his punishment would be that he could keep only $70,000 of it. Comment: if you or I earned $100,000, the tax people would let us keep far, far less of it than that.At this stage, the principal Senators "on the bubble" appear to be Bond, Hatch, Bennett, Cochran, and Coleman. To stop cloture, all their votes are needed. Suggestion to fellow bigots: bombard them with calls, faxes, and e-mails. And throw in Sen. Burr, who apparently has caved, something a North Carolinian has no business even considering doing.
And Republican Sen. Craig Thomas (a dependable fellow "bigot") died recently of leukemia. His replacement, Republican John Barrasso, was appointed by Democratic Wyoming Governor Dave Freudenthal. Barrasso is described as very conservative, but, under the circumstances, I smell a rat. We need to get on Barrasso immediately, at 202-224-6441 (Thomas's old number) and make sure we'll put up with nothing less than utter bigotry on BBB. It wouldn't sruprise me if his is intended to be the deciding vote in favor of cloture qua amnesty qua the death of America (and the birth of América).
Don't waste your time on Grahamnesty, John "McCainnedy," or Richard "Lugar Para Todos" (lugar para todos being español for "room for all comers"). They appear to be lost causes, though Arizona's John "Guile" may merit some bigoted harassment just on general principle.
PS: ttp://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm has an alphabetical list of all 100 Senators (though Barrasso's name hasn't replaced Thomas's as of this writing). while http://www.weneedafence.com/contactsenate.asp has them all listed alphabetically by state.
.