by Charles R Lewis,
Moderator,
SaveAmericaSummit
America now appears on the brink of a veritable dark
age, just when she can least afford one. Driven by out of control and out of
sight energy prices (with the cost of food and just about everything else
inexorably following suit), her prosperous lifestyle is steadily seeping beyond
the reach of her sleeping masses.
And this is occurring just at a time
when the apparent impending election of one of the three remaining marxist
presidential candidates figures to plunge this nation into the hell of absolute
socialism, which will drain the lifeblood of the incentive-based system that has
made us great, gut our First and Second Amendment liberties, and destroy what is
left of our rugged individualist demographic.
It's happening even as our
tradition of innovation is at stake, as our congress prepares to destroy
traditional patent protections in favor of a ChiCom pirate-friendly system.
...And as that same congress is poised to override a presidential veto of a farm
bill packed with unprecendented corporate welfare for big
agribusiness.
Most importantly, it's taking place at a time when we need
to be financially sound as we take on the threats of Islamoafascist terror,
aggressive Chinese expansionism, KGB-based Russian opposition to our purely
defensive SDI system, and UN one world totalitarianism (to which Bush would have
us submit, via UNCLOS, and Obama wants us to surrender totally via his Global
Poverty Act).
Yes, the timing for the coming era of not being able to
afford to drive (and therefore to work), or even to "eat what we want to" (in
Obama's scornful words) is perfect. In the name of "saving the planet," we are
destroying America, liberty, the Christian west, and western civilization in
general, which are that planet's only hopes.
The consistency of this
outcome makes it painfully clear that this is the real objective. Otherwise our
political leaders would allow at least some of the following:
1 The drilling for oil on Alaska's north slope, 1,000
miles from civilization. where we have enough oil to place us on the level of a
major OPEC nation. The natural gas pipeline project of a few decades back
did nothing to hurt flora and fauna. The enormous increase in supply of oil
could not help but drive prices way down (at last check, it was 15¢ a gallon in
oil-rich communist Venezuela).
2 The
drilling for oil offshore, especially in the Caribbean, where the Chinese and
Cubans are currently stealing it from under our noses. That's within
sight of parts of Florida, no less.
3 The
insistence (about to be abdicated via Bush's attempted ratification of the
UNCLOS - or Law of the Seas - treaty) that the vast petroleum resources under
the North Pole, to which we were first to arrive (long the standard for such
claims) is ours. This is critical, as that treaty will doubtlessly lead
to the ceding to Russia (with its huge supply of nuclear ICBM's) of not only
this massive oil supply, but the strategic polar region itself.
4 The building (which hasn't happened for well over
three decades) of new oil refineries and updating of the ones we have. At
this critical time, our refinery output is actually declining.
5 The conversion of coal (which we have in an abundance
that could make us the equivalent of Saudi Arabia in this field) to
gasoline. Again, it's the "environmentalists" qua anti-Americans in our
midst who are blocking this huge opportunity.
6 The conversion of shale - of which we are said to have
the potential for over a trillion barrels - to gasoline. In Utah and
elsewhere, we are blessed with the world's greatest supply, and we now have the
technology to start expoiting it. But the very real prospect of $15 a gallon gas
(and food riots) isn't enough to budge the environazis who control our
government.
7 The building of more
(squeaky clean environmentally) nuclear plants (something else we haven't done
in over three decades). France runs almost exclusively on this highly
economical technology. If you haven't noticed, electric bills have tripled in
recent years, and are on the verge of skyrocketing again.
8 The building of many more hydroelectric dams.
The snail darter/spotted owl genre of excuses continues to block this safe,
clean option.
9 The exploitation of our
massive natural gas resources. Home heating gas prices have gone through
the roof at a rate that dwarfs even the increased costs of electricity. Natural
gas is a far cleaner commodity than oil, yet the environmentalists find
rationales to block it.
10 Taking the
handcuffs off our auto manufacturers and innovators in terms of fuel
efficiency. Back in the '70's, there was a lot of rustling about emerging
technologies with the potential to get over 100 mpg, a technology that was
summarily squelched. Environmental regulations (which tend to merely replace one
pollutant with another - usually more toxic - one) greatly reduce the mpg of
most cars. A dozen years ago, I purchased a Hyundai stick shift that was the
cheapest model on the market, and it got literally 45 miles per gallon on the
highway. Try finding one like that nowadays.
It would seem that all of
the above is a no-brainer. Far from this, it's not even part of the discussion,
for the most part. This is the result of a major disinformation campaign -
mostly on the part of our mainstream media and "education" system, especially in
the three major areas outlined below. To accomplish the above, we need to stop
listening to the lies and liars hereby listed:
1 The global warming alarmists. The founders of
both Greenpeace and the Weather Channel have decried the man-made global warming
threat mantra as totally fallacious and politically driven. Over 31,000 American
scientists have recently risked their careers to stand up to the Al Gore crowd.
We are now in the midst of a decade of cooling, with this year in many respects the
coldest on record. And over the period of the decades where we were warming, all
of the other solar system planets warmed as well (it's the sun,
stupid).
Carbon is good for the environment, as it nourishes the plants
that nourish us. And 800 years ago, when the world was much warmer than it is
now (and when the technology on which the liars blame the recent warming did not
exist), there were no environmental catastrophes, and civilization flourished.
There were even functional farming communities in Greenland, which is now buried
under massive ice.
2 The tree huggers and
the "personhood for animals" mafia. The polar bear population has
quintupled in the past few decades. In one particiularly egregious recent
example, an owl was declared endagered - removing millions of Tucson-area acres
from potential development - just because its numbers were modest on the US side
of the border, while at the same time the critter was ubiquitous in
Mexico.
The Bush administration administered no meaningful punishment to
the perpetrators of the linx hair fraud. It goes on and on, and the results
always cripple humans, supposedly for the sake of wild animals that were created
to adapt at any rate, and do not need our help.
3 Those who perpetuate the myth that oil is a depletable
fossil fuel. America's foremost investigative reporter, Jerome Corsi,
wrote, with Craig Smith several yeers ago, Black Gold Sranglehold, which pretty well
established that oil is abiotic (non-fossil) and that it is formed in the
earth's core, where it is virtually inexhaustible. More recent information has
only lent support to this contention. A huge Brazilian offshore discovery has
just about proven it beyond doubt.
Thus, the argument that even if we
exploit all the above listed resources we'll eventually run out and have to face
what we're facing now is specious. We have every reason to go after this
God-bestowed benefit with every tool and all the energy we can
muster.
Instead, what we get from our "leadership" are calls for even
more government intervention in the affairs of private stockholder (you and me,
especially via our retirement plan investments) owned oil companies and their
profits (negligible compared to the share government gets in taxes)...oh, and a
clamoring for even higher energy taxes, explicitly to control our behavior, in terms of
consumption.
That's right - less freedom, bigger government, more
restrictions on industry and the profit motive, and even higher prices are the
answers forthcoming from our government. And - except in terms of nuclear plants
- John McCain is no better than Clinton or Obama (who adamantly oppose all ten
of the above steps) on these issues.
The incoming administration - at
least if it's a Democrat or Republican one - will usher in a Mad-Max-like era of
economic and social chaos in America that will far eclipse that of the great
depression. And that's a best case scenario. This is a pity, as we could
completely avoid this if we took a few common sense, liberty-based
steps.