About Me

Name: Charles Lewis
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

Congress's ACORN Shell Game

Congress's ACORN Shell Game
 
Bill that bans direct funding establishes total fed takeover of higher ed, universal ACORN-style army among loan recipients
 
by Charles R Lewis
 
In what was mostly advertised as a rebuke to the now-thoroughly tainted ACORN (of which your prez was national training director), the House of Representatives yesterday passed what in actuality is at once its most draconian and most unconstitutional piece of legislation ever rammed through under the collective noses of the unsuspecting, uneducated American public.  And, once Mr Obama finishes packing the Supreme Court with Sotomayor and Sunstein types (and quite likely under the current lineup), forget about that august body nullifying that act of tyranny.  To wit:
 
The bill (incredibly) establishes the federal government as the only legal source for student loans for college.  No more loans from private banks and the like.  What this means is a twofold scenario of despotism worthy of the worst of a Nazi Germany or a communist Cuba:
 
- Lotsa luck if you think this government will approve loans to any of the few remaining traditionalist schools like Hillsdale or Patrick Henry.  Not unless they abandon their conservative principles and join the rest of the American higher education system in terms of the predominance of far left teaching staffs and the promotion of communism as the only acceptable ideology.  If not,such institutions will wither on the vine for lack of funding and most likely be forced to close their doors,
 
- Even more ominously, one will recall that when Obama first proposed (again it's amazing how fast even the most revolutionary of his proposals have moved forward) making the federal government the source of all student loans, he tied receipt to "community service."  Having researched such programs (see http://www.edwatch.org/index.html and http://www.edwatch.org/index.html), I have no doubt that such "service" will involve the promised 6-week AMERICORPS-style indoctrination camps followed by the ACORN-style leftwing activism of Obama's coveted "civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded" as the military.  In other words, a heinous "brownshirt" army - worthy of those of a Castro or Hitler, pledging its allegiance not to the Constitution but to our fearless leader - set loose on the America populace, with Christians, conservatives, constitutionalists, libertarians, and those who want to cling to the Bill or Rights defined as the "terrorist" enemy - with determined participation a requirement for admission to college.
 
As usual, the media - even the "conservative" media - is focused on the entirely irrelevant red herring of the rider that de-funds ACORN.  (Never mind that ACORN as such is presently just a small part of a nexus of innumerable groups under the same umbrella that will easily pick up the slack.)  The total federal (and, effectively, communist) takeover of post-secondary education is the real story here.
 
It is a stunning move, worthy of the most authoritarian of totalitarian states.  It dwarfs in significance the previous takeovers of the likes of the banking and automotive industries.  Under the guise of freeing us from the corruption of ACORN, it creates in effect a mega-ACORN, encompassing nearly all of our youth with college aspirations.
 
Limbaugh noted it in passing, but, characteristically, only emphasized it in the sense that the feds would now be able to set interest rates sans competition, utterly ignoring the likelihood that conservative schools will be put out of business, or the looming "community service army" factor.  I'm an ardent Glenn Beck and Jim Quinn listener, and I haven't heard either breathe a word on the topic.
 
This most devastating American legislation ever passed threatens to turn our progeny into our enemy, spying on us and perhaps even assaulting us at the behest and whim of an ever stronger dictator (Opinion Dynamics - even after all the revelations and Tea Parties and Town Halls and the like - has him at 54% approval - 2% more than he got in the election, Heaven forbid!).  We need to get on our knees and ask, nonstop, for forgiveness and a miracle.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Hitler/Castro strategy for the minds of our youth

Obama's Hitler/Castro strategy for the minds of our youth
by Charles Lewis
 
On Tuesday, September 9, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama will address America's government school children via the technology of classroom televisions.  The announcement of the broadcast has raised the hackles nationwide of parents (who should know better than to assign their children to the "care" of the world's worst school system in the first place), mainly in terms of its being a brazen, naked propaganda move designed to recruit the next generation of leftwing voters. A few more salient comments on the matter follow:
 
The double standard entailed is stunning.  We're told that parents will be allowed, at least in many schools, to opt their children out of the exercise.  Yet back when prayer was outlawed, it was suggested that parents who objected could do likewise.  This was rejected, as it supposedly would stigmatize those students who had to leave the room during those periods.  Instead, prayer was banned outright.  One wonders why the same standards aren't applied in this case.
 
Additionally, the lesson plan at least originally called for the students to be asked what Obama was asking of them  Obama.  Ostensibly a human being.  If the kids (grades pre-K thru 6!) were asked what Jesus Christ was asking of them, the authorities in the given school (especially in light of recent events) would immediately be subject to imprisonment.  And the assignment (supposedly changed today in the face of the furor - but I have my doubts) also asked them to write an essay detailing how they could help our fuhrer attain his goals.
 
Another revelation: on today's G Gordon Liddy show, quotes were offered from the reading lists accompanying the presentation.  In a sequence of grade level-linked books, all were all Obama, all praise, all the time.  All glorified "the one," presenting him as America's savior in an hour of great need, the guy that would unite the races, and fulfill his destiny as a virtual Messiah.  The kind of stuff that gave Hitler and Castro their demigod status among respective generations of national youth that cemented their spiritual authority as unchallenged dictators.  Nothing less.
 
Finally, the skinny is that the message is to be an innocent, non-partisan one about applying oneself in the classroom, working hard, doing one's homework, and the like.  I have no doubt this is the case. But, in the first place, it establishes the man in the minds of the children as a benevolent leader who has naught but their best interests at heart.  Second, it offers the proposition that they should do things things because HE wants them to.  But more than that, it gets his foot in the door as step one in the following insidious program of gradualism.  I predict that:
Step 2 will entail a second presentation where they will be exhorted to perform community service (unpaid servitude, at that).
 
Step 3 will be a call to community activism, where they will be urged to promote a variety of leftwing causes (global warming, anti-guns, anti-"hate crimes"...).
 
Step 4 (perhaps to be combined with step 3) would involve community organizing along the same lines.
 
They will then be primed for the final step - induction into the promise "domestic army - just as strong, just as well funded as the military," primed and ready to spy - and prey - upon parents, conservatives, Christians, Bill of Rights advocates, and similar domestic "terrorists."
 
It's all in line with the Alinsky-Hitler-Castro gameplan, so tried and true - and so toxic to all we hold dear.  Here it comes.  State sovereignty states must unite, and resist, pledging our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Taking Stock

by Charles Lewis,
SC Chairman, America's Independent Party
 
Let's see where we stand:
 
We have an alleged president whose Kenyan grandmother swears she witnessed his birth there.
 
He attended Muslim school in Indonesia at a time when only Indonesian Muslims were permitted to attend - and under the name "Barry Soetero," indicating he had been adopted by his mother's Indonesian Muslim second husband and did indeed have Indonesian citizenship.
 
He roomed with a foreign student at a college which at the time did not room American students with foreigners.
 
He traveled to Pakistan at a time when American citizens could not get visas to travel to Pakistan.
 
He has spent around $1,000,000.00 in legal fees keeping documentation on any of this from going public (an unprecedented concealment); a supposed Hawaiian "birth certificate" turned out to be a "certificate of live birth," with scant information, which could be obtained at the time on the simple word of his mother (who had ample incentive to pass him off as a citizen even if he wasn't), and which turned out to have many earmarks of an obvious fake.
 
When an army major - scheduled for Afghan deployment - was ruled to have legal standing to demand "discovery" (proof that the "president" deploying him was indeed qualified for the office of Commander-in-Chief), the major's deployment was abruptly canceled and his standing thereby removed.  Even though this could open a Pandora's box for all military personnel deployed anywhere to see such deployment revoked, apparently keeping the truth from coming out overrides such concerns with the regime in power.
 
And now we have a purported Kenyan birth certificate that the experts do not seem able to debunk...
 
The mainstream media, of course, makes no reference to any of this, except to caustically deride anyone who expresses concern over any of these issues.
 
[Some conservatives claim it would be fruitless to get the guy tossed out, that chaos would ensue, and that Joe Biden , in any case, would be just as bad.
 
As for chaos, what do we have now, with ACORN, Americorps, and La Raza in charge?  And, with a chance to start from scratch on all this heinous legislation (with a chance to read it first this time, after being ruched into passing it with forecasts of 9% unemployment - which we've already exceeded - if we didn't), and armed with the common knowledge that we've been duped by history's greatest conman, how could we do any worse.
 
And I'll take my chances with a bumbling Joe over a smooth talking, hypnotic virtual anitchrist (with the race card and white guilt to fall back  on, at that, not to mention teleprompters) any time.  He'd be much easier to deflect.]
 
And what has this evident usurper of a prez done during his first months in office?
 
He has passed legislation (with much more on tap) that has set the wheels in motion to impoverish and immobilize the next several generations of Americans (spending only about 10% of the appropriated monies - apparently because. had he spent much more, hyperinflation would have already wiped out most of our life savings and turned the public so against him that the rest of his devastatingly destructive agenda would be dead in the water).
 
He is on the verge of passing laws that will destroy our health and nutrition (and much more).
 
He has taken over industry after industry and appears poised to take over the rest.
 
He has sounded the death knell for independent small business and rendered us impotent to compete against foreign slave labor and countries that allow the tapping of energy resources far less than our own abundant ones (which he refuses to let us touch, apparently our of pure desire to render us too weak to resist a coming one world totalitarian takeover).
 
Like any dictator worth his salt, he has set up a shadow government of demi-dictators (or "czars") answerable only to him, and gone about shutting down opposition speech.
 
And most of us sheeple sit blithely by, absorbed in spectacles like "American Idol," "America's Got Talent," and the like.  Well, I've got news for America.  America's got problems - big problems - and cannot afford to be idle any longer.
 
Can anyone say, "end times?"  I'd make a commitment to side with righteousnes, if I were me - or you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why say "no" to socialism?

by Charles Lewis

The caller to the Rusty Humphries show had to be in his twenties at most.  His question reflected that, along with the fact that he must have been government schooled, which, thanks to the NEA and the other educrat institutions, has long sheltered students from the truth about such issues as we're about to discuss.  That question: "what's wrong with socialism?"

Rusty's valid, but typically incomplete response (typical of someone who, at another juncture of the same show, denied, even at this highly advanced stage, the existence of a conspiracy for one world government): "socialism has never worked anywhere."  When the caller replied that it's worked here, Rusty did a little better, citing the bankrupt state of social security, medicare, and all the other socialist programs to which the caller might have been referring.

But that was still poor, considering the overwhelming body of philosophical, psychological, and historical evidence against the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on mankind.  My answer would have started with a few choice names: "Hitler, Stalin, Castro, Chavez, Ortega, Ho, Mao, Mussolini, Mugabe" - socialists all, grave oppressors all, mass murderers on a scale the world had never previously seen.

The caller's retort may have been that these were extreme socialists (mostly communists, actually).  I would have been ready for that.

I would have pointed out that "mild" socialism leads inexorably to the harsh form.  That its central tenet, "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs" runs so counter to human nature, so destroys progress, innovation, and prosperity, it can never be an end in itself.

I'd have told the caller that America's greatness and prosperity stem from her unprecedented adherence to the totally contrary theory that one is entitled to the fruits of one's own labors (I probably would have cited Rick Santelli's recent CNBC "Chicago tea party" outburst as evidence of the universality of the principle's self-evident appeal).  I would have pointed out that the last vestiges, however, of this principle have been discarded with Obama's recent spending bill.

I would have described a hypothetical John Jones, who works super hard his whole life, saves, invents, builds a better mousetrap, whatever, then pays his house off and provides a life of comfort for his beloved family.  Along comes Joe Smith, who, by contrast, has either sat on his fanny his while life, squandered his money on wine, woman, and song, or a combination of the two.  Now our socialist government, with its ideal of equal outcomes, decrees that Jones must pay the mortgage for Smith.

Under such a system, I would have noted (and shown that history bears this out), Jones will soon stop innovating, soon stop working  hard, and eventually see that there's no advantage in working at all, and cease.  It's at that point that the inevitable metamorphosis occurs.  In order to maintain the faux religion of socialism, government then has to force it subjects to work.

That is when socialism must become some form of bolshevism.  It's not the wealth that gets distributed equally.  There can be no wealth (except for that segment of the population composed of party members, generally 2%, who co-opt what there is of it for themselves, even further impoverishing the other 98%) only equally distributed misery, in this most corrupt system of government and economics ever conceived and implemented.

I would have added that socialism is such a lie that it must be vigilantly protected from the truth.  That is why "Fairness" Doctrines and the like are in the works to shut down opposition speech in the airwaves and even on the Internet.

Join the "just say, 'no' to socialism" movement brewing in America.  Stand up for the 10th Amendment, and for those provisions in our national constitution and those of your state that provide protection against the insidious tyranny in already-passed legislation and those bills waiting in the wings.

Draw the line when it comes to North American integration, martial law, evaporation of free speech, gun confiscation and ammunition unavailability, conscription of middle schoolers into a gestapo-style elitist ultra-funded military, further oppression of Christians, government control of all health decisions, mandatory government school attendance and the like.  Join or form a state sovereignty movement in your state - before it is too late.

Refuse, resist, separate.  Preserve what's left of the spirit of America - in whatever nooks and crannies where we still can.  Stand shoulder to shoulder with America's Independent Party, and say "no" to the unparalleled evil of socialism that is gripping America.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "cause he's black " illusion - and some reality

Perhaps the most misleading charge of this presidential campaign is that blacks are voting for Barack Hussein Obama simply because he's black. This charge is a major off-putter, and it's simply wrong.

If it were the case, black conservatives like Alan Keyes, Ken Blackwell, Michael Steele, Vernon Robinson, and legions of others would have gotten more of the black vote than the infinitessimal percentage that white conservatives get. But they haven't, so let's stop mouthing ridiculous rhetoric that paints us as hopelessly out of touch.

Oh, blackness is a factor, perhaps, in certain people's willingness to overlook ovewhelming evidence that the Barackstar is essentially equivalent to his "cousin" Raila Odinga, a communist and recent sharia law "convert" (those two phenomena are essentially the same, by the way) who recently orchestrated the slaughter of over 1,000 Christians in Kenya after an election loss there, and whom Obama had campaigned for vigorously and kicked a cool million in contributions.

But - thanks to our managed media - most blacks haven't heard about this (or the litany of other major red flags we dwell on), except perhaps in the context of the Obamedia's characterization of them as unconscionable "politics of personal destruction" (funny how Geraldine Ferraro's meager experience in the House was never an issue, while Palin's governorship of a state the size of half the other 49 combined marks her as a dangerous lightweight...).

No, blacks overwhelmingly support the Obamarxist for the same reason they supported aritocratic white New Englander John Kerry about as strongly - it's the (D) after the name, stupid.

Liberal Democrats have systematically given the race a mass inferiority complex. Most blacks are thoroughly convinced that without huge handouts and affirmative action preferences, they are incapable of surviving - on merit and industriousness alone - in a competitive society.

[Ironically, due to the school system to which that party has relegated them, along with the agitation of "community organizers" who convey the notion that such industriousness is pointless, this misperception has become has become a reality in a multitude of cases.]

Blacks believe - as much unconsciously as consciously - that without the Democratic crutch they will simply die out as a race, by starvation. (Ironic that Democrat handmaiden Planned Parenthood is accomplishing the race's eliination by other means...)

So the Dems have produced themselves a permanently dependent client class, among the vast majority of blacks. And they're well along the road to producing another one among Hispanics - particularly the 50,000,000 or so about to receive amnesty (you can't possibly still believe the "12-20,000,000" fantasy - not now that the government has admitted it used your tax monies to give 5,000,000 of them sub-prime mortgages...).

So the Obommunist essentially can do with America as he and his coming superMarxority see fit. And what might that be?

On a recent talking heads program, Rick Santorum was challenged to name something in the Obamagenda that coincided with the views of his longtime associate, communist/terrorist/educrat guru Bill Ayers. Rather than cite the obvious confluence on education (to the tune, for instance, of $60,000,000.00 plus in Annenberg grants - nobody ever has the courage on such shows to cite stuff like that), Santorum launched into a sermon on wealth redistribution.

While he was correct, does he think anybody cares? Welfare itself is pure wealth redistribution.

What Santorum should had alluded to is something like the following. When socialist dictators - from Castro to Hitler - have come to power, three things top the list of priorities.

They shut down the opposition's means of communicating - or even ascertaining - what the given dictator and his minions are doing to the given country. They confiscate guns. And they establish, among the youth, quasi-military brigades, orientated around the dictator's cult of personality and collectivist ideology.

Let's look at a few aspects Obama's "plan for change" in this light:

The Obama-Pelosi-Reid cabal is on the verge of destroying conservative talk radio (via the "Fairness Doctrine"), emasculating conservative communication on the Internet vis a vis pending legislation (via "Grassroots Lobbying Reform"), and placing pastors under the same cloud under which exist their counterparts in Europe, Australia, Canada, and Colorado (in terms of fines, jail time, or closing down of ministries - for preaching what the Bible says about homosexuality or abortion, or refusing to state publicly that all religions are equal - via a "hate crimes" act).

The Obantichrist is on record as opposing the private ownership of handguns.

And a centerpiece of the Obeast's agenda is a "community service"-based "domestic army" - funded equally to the armed forces. High schoolers and collegians would be forced to participate. A glimpse into a YouTube of a corps that seems to have jumped the gun reveals a uniformed militia of teenagers, stridenty chanting "alpha and omega" re their charismatic false messianic anti-hero.

What we see is a veritable creature of Dr FrankenAyers' wildest imagination.

It appears out of man's hands to do anything to save America, as it's always been out of his hands to save himself. Do what you can to educate, but at the same time pray night and day.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Up CLose with the Real Bad Guys

Samir Kantar was released from an Israeli prison yesterday and returned to his Hezbollah comrades in Lebanon (itself a former Christian nation, since absolutely ravaged by that terrorist menagerie), in what was sardonically portrayed as a "prisoner exchange." In return for the unleashing back on the civilized world of Kantar and four similar demons, Israel received the two soldiers whose kidnapping two years ago provoked a war between that nation and Lebanese Hezbollah - Eldad Regev and Ehud Goldwasser.

[This five-for-two "swap" was actually more in line with reason than previous "deals," in which the ratio has often been 500 (terrorists) to 1 (Israeli).]

There was just one hitch in the "mega-trade" (the same one present in some of the above referenced prior "transactions") "Prisoners" Regev and Golwasser were returned somewhat dead - no doubt having been tortured to slow, agonizing deaths. Contrastingly, the Hezbollah "players" were whole, sound, and healthy, having lavished in Israeli prisons, where their lives were likely much better than the squalor in which Hamas forces its Palestinian subjects to live (for purposes of keeping them desperate enough to continue their campaigns of suicide attacks).

Kantar's words, upon his return: "We swear by God ... to continue on your same path and not to retreat until we achieve the same stature that God bestowed on you [referencing a fallen heinous comrade - now ostensibly busy deflowering his 70-odd maidens - at whose grave the words were spoken]."

That Kantar had been considered worthy of release taxes one's imagination, in terms of how despicable must have been the crimes of those still imprisoned. Kantar had shot an Israeli father on a beach in front of his 4-year-old daughter, then drowned him, as she was forced to watch. Next he bludgeoned the girl to death via quite a few blows with the butt of his rifle.

He wasn't finished. He proceeded to the family's home, where he sought out more victims. The girl's mother and 2-year-old sister were hiding in a small storage area adjacent to a bedroom. The toddler began to cry, and the mom held her hand over the little girl's mouth to silence her, accidentally smothering her to death. A few minutes later, Kanter killed an Israeli policeman.

And this was one of the types Israeli Traitor-in-Chief Ehud Olmert felt worthy of release - in exchange for Israeli corpses. Actually makes a sick sort of sense. Israeli corpses - both sides seem to agree - are worth more than these scumbags are, alive and kicking.

Some reflection is in order. These are the sort of people that presidential candidates like Obama, Paul, Baldwin, and Barr tell us we should sit down with and talk to. The ones we supposedly provoked into attacking us on 9/11.

The kind of vermin whom the last three of these candidates depict as victims of American "imperialism."

The genre that Obama finds so minimally threatening he advocates dismantling of our defenses and ceasing of any future upgrades.

The term, "animal" is too generous for swine like Kantar and his millions of clones worldwide. "Monster" says it better, but there really isn't an English word that adequately describes them.

Perhaps "monster" does suffice to characterize the aforementioned "leaders" who would appease them.

I'm not sure.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pigskin Politics

In case you haven't noticed, America's political goalposts keep moving further to the left every election cycle. When I voted for George Bush (I told friends I did so only because I was convinced he didn't want me to - so appalling were his antics seemingly designed, in true RINO fall-on-your sword fashion, to get lifelong open communist John Kerry elected - and I wasn't going to let him get away with it), I told myself that was as far left as I was going to let my personal goalposts get pushed.

Well, John McCain is so far left he makes George Bush look like George Gipp (as in "the Gipper," himself a football hero). So far left that if either he or Obama wins, there is no more America.

Paths to citizenship, lack of a fence, and intimidation of border agents - via incarceration - to the point that they dare not do their jobs in many circumstances mean we're about to turn, demographically, into one of those South or Central American countries electing communist dictators as presidents. And there goes free speech, the web, property rights, gun rights, the sanctity of marriage and of life itself, American sovereignty, and the "oil-starved-while-we're-sitting-on-top-of-the-world's-greatest-potential-supply" economy, as well.

Either way. Wrap your mind around that, and drive through the ball carrier.

Just as surely as Obama will run us out of the stadium, McCain will push us into the stands. Either way, it's over; the game is lost. Our children face a future of gas price-induced starvation and/or communist or Islamofascist one world slavery, with Christianity a capital offense.

Sorry, GOP fans, it's no more, "Hold that line!" for me. America desperately needs to "Push 'em back, push 'em back, Waaaaaay back!' and fast.

Alan Keyes blew out the field in the '96 Republican debates so badly that even in the ultra-liberal DC area where I resided he ran up the score in an informal WMAL on-air poll. Consequently, he has not been permitted, in general, in debates ever since.

He is absolutely down-the-line Reaganite Christian conservative. He even knows the communists, Islamists and world federalist socialists (and not us) are the world's bullies. And he doesn't blame America for 9/11. And he's an all-pro icon in the movement.

And he's running. He has organizations in all 50 states, a chance for ballot access in most of them and official write-in status in the rest, a brand new party (America's Independent Party), umbrella affiliation under existing 3rd parties where appropriate, independent status where that fits the bill, and the unabashed locker room prayers of Christians and conservatives nationwide.

The clock is ticking; it's past the 2-minute warning, and we are not giving up. Find out how you can get involved by going to
http://www.selfgovernment.us/aip/. It ain't over till the final gun. Immaculate receptions have happened before; "hail, Mary's" have connected.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »